The past seems to be
escapable. For every forward thinking thought there are ten more sneaking up to
bombard our minds. It is as if we are driving forward, but continually looking
into our rearview mirror for direction. Charles Jencks refers to the idea of
preserving the past in his article, “The Emergent Rules,” which outlines the
elements of postmodern art. In the article, Jencks (1987) refers to the idea of
“anamnesis,” or “suggested recollection” (p. 286). When I first read over this
idea I was very excited because it was the first aha moment I’ve had in our CMC
class. What I liked most about the idea of anamnesis is that it is all around
us. The clothes we wear and even the buildings we erect all have a sense of
past remembrance that is inescapable. The reason for this inability to elude our
past is because it lives through us and in us. “[The] only escape from
rule-governed art is to suppress from our consciousness the canons behind one's
creativity” (Jencks 1987, p. 281). This statement creates turbulence because it
means that we can’t liberate ourselves from conventional thinking.
An even more powerful example of anamnesis is in
the art of Ann and Patrick Poirer. In their art they show a fragmented past
through segmented buildings, stones, and landscape. What I like about this, is
that it reflects our inability to remember the past in its totality. While the
past may be present in our lives it’s only “half-remembered” (Jencks, p.286).
No matter how hard we try the past can only be seen in the fractions we
remember them and unfortunately only in the ways we perceived them.
No comments:
Post a Comment